Al-Dura affair, a hoax or blood libel?

This November 14th France2 and Charles Enderlin projected in the French court of appeal the complete rushes made on September 30th, 2000 at Netzarim. Complete? Charles Endelin has cut at least nine minutes of the 27 minutes of the original he pretended to have.
Anyhow from the viewing of the original rushes it is clear that the young Mohammed Al Dura was not killed at the end of the rushes. It ended, after the assumed killing with a view of the boy lifting his elbow and looking to the camera as if he was questionning the taking was finished.
What is also astonishing: on the whole video there is nowhere blood seen, no Israeli soldiers nor rifles, no bullets, no injuries. Nothing.
Is the whole case a hoax? Most of the people that were present in the court think so.

by Rudi Roth at Sun Nov 18 09:50:26 UTC 2007 (ed. May 30 2008) Brussels, Belgium | Bookmark this | Digg this |

on may 21st a French court finally decided that the Al Dura/Al Durrra “killing” can be described as an hoax.
More on it from the WSJ
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121183757337520921.html

It shows that nobody should always believe pictures even when they are distributed by an official TV station from France

by Rudi Roth | 30 May 2008 18:05 | Brussels, Belgium |

Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
via RSS Recommended	via email You can unsubscribe later.

More about sponsorship→

Participants

Rudi Roth

Dr in Physics, consultant

Brussels , Belgium

Keywords

alduradurahdurradouraCharlesenderlinfrancephilippekarsentyRichardlandestheaugeanstables

Top↑ | RSS/XML | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | support@lightstalkers.org