<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] Guide to Internet Research</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/guide-to-internet-research</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Guide to Internet Research</title>
      <description>
This website is jammed full of resources for researching a story, checking news worldwide (radio, tv, newspapers etc.), translation tools, video search, audio search, maps, weather ... 

http://www.journalismnet.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/guide-to-internet-research</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guide to Internet Research</title>
      <description>Yeah - I love that site, but am I the only one to notice that the quality of information on an internet site is inversely proportional to the quality of presentation of that information?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/guide-to-internet-research#4590</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guide to Internet Research</title>
      <description>Right on.  Check the latest issue of The Economist an article about BBC and the money, resources etc. they are putting into their online work - interesting - its titled Newspapers Struggle Online. June 16th print edition.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/guide-to-internet-research#4619</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Guide to Internet Research</title>
      <description>Yeah - read that article yesterday actually.

They have a bit of an unfair advantage with resources, but it's a great product.

I must admit though that I'd love to see them take their analysis a lot further - I'm always left feeling that I have just read a great introduction to a topic but not much more. Maybe they need a &quot;BBC In Depth&quot; section or something. That's a personal bias though.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/guide-to-internet-research#4621</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
