<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] Shooting the Truth</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/shooting-the-truth</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Shooting the Truth</title>
      <description>Research project of interest to photojournalism community:

http://shootingthetruth.blogspot.com/</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/shooting-the-truth</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shooting the Truth</title>
      <description>The original premise is flawed because &quot;truth&quot; in photography is impossible to define.  For example, consider a photographer focusing only on a gorgeous flower in bloom, one nanometer out of frame from a mass grave containing countless rotting corpses.  Is the resulting, absolutely stunning, totally unmanipulated flower photo telling the stupid &quot;truth&quot;?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/shooting-the-truth#118232</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
