<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] New redesigned web page</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/new-redesigned-web-page</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>New redesigned web page</title>
      <description>I have a brand new web page. Take a look here &quot;Keith Dannemiller Photographer Mexico&quot;:http://www.keithdannemiller.com.

Thanks,
Keith</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/new-redesigned-web-page</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New redesigned web page</title>
      <description>Hey Kieth,

Loved &quot;dancers&quot; and some real gems in &quot;thats life&quot; not crazy about the edit of workers and portraits, although the photographs are great I feel there is a conflict between the straight commercial portrait and the funky portrait same with &quot;workers&quot; (straight/comercial).  Maybe if you were to separate commercial/editorial from personal and place them in separate sections of the website?  Also some of the pics seem a little washed out, i'm not sure if this has something to do with my screen but I thought I might let you know.  Nice to see new work though.

Felicidades,

Adam</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/new-redesigned-web-page#129643</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New redesigned web page</title>
      <description>Hello Keith,

your images are washed,  but it's not your fault, I had downloaded two of your jpegs to check and they look very good in Photoshop.

Well... I think that the problem is the tool that you used to make the gallery, a Java script or something in the CSS that make the link is creating like a translucid layer, try to disable the click option on the images.

One more thing: compress the images a little bit, save them with quality 9 or maybe save again with 10. 380kb on an image is too high, try to work with 70-120kb on each one.

Now, what really matters, nice set of photographs. I like more the color photographs from the essays and the portraits. I can see what Adam said about comercial/personal, but I think that it could (maybe...) be solved just reediting the photos, this way you don't need to split your work.


abs,

- Guilherme</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/new-redesigned-web-page#129654</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New redesigned web page</title>
      <description>nice minimalist site:) 
no washing out of photos here, 

agree with guilherme,  you need to scale them down in size, checked a few of them and they are between 400-500 kb in file-size. that's half a megabyte. takes for ages to download each one of them, even on a 5000kb/s dsl connection.

with the save-for-web in ps you should be able to strip them down to 100-200kb each, at least...

:)
marius</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/new-redesigned-web-page#129682</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
