<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] decent digital pocket camera?</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>Is there a decent digital pocket camera out there?  I bought a Ricoh GX200 to use when an slr wouldn't work.  Image quality is barely acceptable at iso 64/100 but not higher.  too much noise.   The shutter lag time with AF is much too slow, something like a half second.  So, is there something out there you would recommend?

thanks!
Rob </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>Canon G10</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera#151885</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>thanks!  I'll check it out.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera#151886</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>one camera you should look at is the Olympus E-P1...  we just finished up an extensive testing of the E-P1, fyi, and comparison with the DSLRs in that price range- Nikon D5000 and Canon Rebel XTi.  some of my initial impressions, along with some file testing, is on the blog- http://www.h2hreviews.com/blog/

the full comparison review should be up by monday, but the first impressions of the file quality is the E-P1 doesn't really measure up to the others, although the features are really nice.  it is, however, a better file than the G10.  </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera#151888</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>Ted what about a vivitar pinhole camera?????</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera#151891</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: decent digital pocket camera?</title>
      <description>well, i'm glad you asked that question...  

&lt;object width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/x1_BQfEq7Bg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/x1_BQfEq7Bg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/decent-digital-pocket-camera#151893</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
