<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] Experiences with Sigma 10-20mm?</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/experiences-with-sigma-10-20mm</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Experiences with Sigma 10-20mm?</title>
      <description>Hello all, I would like to know wether any of you own this lens and what you make of it. Any problems, limitations one should be aware of?

I work for a small university newspaper and need to photograph in small spaces, like offices and small shops (occasionally). I don't really have the money to go for the 12-24mm Nikkor and Tokina is impossible to get here in Hungary so I'm stuck with this choice. Thanks, Andr&#195;&#161;s.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/experiences-with-sigma-10-20mm</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with Sigma 10-20mm?</title>
      <description>Hi Kalmar, I've no experience with that lens in particular but I've had a Sigma 15-30mm for about 3 years, on a Canon 20D, 10D and an Elan7E and is a great lens. &lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
In general, I've had good experience with sigma lenses, much more so than with Tamron lenses, for example. I would say the same should apply to Nikon bodies...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
L&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/experiences-with-sigma-10-20mm#17768</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with Sigma 10-20mm?</title>
      <description>Good value for money. Sharp. Better than the Nikon equivalent. Some compatibility problems with the Nikon D200 which are supposed to be fixed with a firmware update. A little &quot;slow&quot; - f5.6 at 20mm. You have to be careful about ligning things up correctly to avoid distorsion. I end up using quite a lot of lens correction in my raw converter, Silkypix, but the results are good generally. I bought mine before Christmas and have used it extensively on every job since...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/experiences-with-sigma-10-20mm#17851</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Experiences with Sigma 10-20mm?</title>
      <description>Hi, I don't have the 10-20, but have used a number of Sigma lenses on Nikon, including the 12-24, which, apart from its bulk and weight is one of my favourite lenses (the exposed front element is always a worry though.) The build quality is generally pretty good - much better than the first Sigma I bought in 1975!&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
This also has the 'bug' with the Nikon D200, but I won't even bother with the firmware update, as it only effects the lens if you choose to work in a particular (and to me peculiar) way.&amp;nbsp; I did fiddle around with the camera to actually confirm the bug existed, but quickly put the camera back to my normal configuration where it works perfectly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
So I'd happily buy the Sigma 10-20. I've also heard very good things about the 18-50 f2.8 which would go nicely with it and give a bit more speed at the top end of the range.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Peter&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/experiences-with-sigma-10-20mm#17855</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
