<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] untitled</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>untitled</title>
      <description>Anyone have experience using Genuine Fractals within PhotoShop?! Anyone who can help will be garanteed at very least a place in heaven next to Allah [those who can also explain to me how best to use it for making big files for print will also receive 40 virgins [male or female depending on yr persusion] and/or much hashish! 
Thanks
Adam</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: untitled</title>
      <description>Reminder -- you don't need to sign your posts... There's already a &quot;Posted by...&quot; tag underneath your post!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687#60</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: untitled</title>
      <description>Hi Adam!

I `ve used GF and it was a helpfull software in the times of Photoshop 5-6 and OS9. At the moment I `ve found that Photoshop CS will do the same. Save Your money and use CS for upscaling. 

And - there is a myth circling that upsizeing with small repeated steps (+10% +10% etc.) will do better job than upsizeing with one step?
MHO: it will not make better result. More important for good results is how sharp/soft the picture is in the beginning and how You  treat the final picture before printing.

Oh, and let the Allah take care of more urgent things going - I think all the Gods are just a bit busy at the moment...

regards, Sami</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687#832</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: untitled</title>
      <description>Hi Adam,

Check out this website: http://www.interpolatethis.com/ it has a bunch of info on interpolation programs with some PS actions for download.

Cheers,

Frazer</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687#941</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: untitled</title>
      <description>hey guys......thanks for the feedback. i've actually been to interpolate this and also left genuine fractals behind a bit after first posting this topic. indeed fractals was more trouble than its worth. 
for my purposes, blowing up prints from video and super-8 movie film, both low res small image size original sources, none of the interpolation programs i tried helped all that much.
actually upsizing with 10% steps did help some. i did side by side comparisons at a printing facility and looked at the results from the traditional all at once upsizing vs. 10% and saw for myself that the latter is better. not night and day but somewhat. but indeed, the quality of the original source is the single biggest factor.
best
adam</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 21:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687#942</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: untitled</title>
      <description>one other remote possibility is to convert your raster image to vector.  Can be time/tedios if looking for exact reproduction.  I use Adobe Streamline (an old program), convert to EPS and then clean up in Illustrator.  But, as the early prophets quiped, &quot;garbage in, garbage out&quot;.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/untitled7687#946</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
