<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>[Lightstalkers] Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
    <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia</link>
    <description>An entire Lightstalkers thread via RSS/XML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
      <description>Adobe and Macromedia &quot;announced today&quot;:http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2005/adobe_macromedia.html that they intend to merge.

It's hard to guess what this means for users of their products; personally I'll be watching for news about Macromedia's server products (Cold Fusion, Flex, etc). Separately I'm hoping that this means an eventual end to the Flash vs. SVG or PDF vs. FlashPaper competition.

Any initial reactions here?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
      <description>I hope this means that Dreamweaver will take GoLive's place in Adobe's software line-up. . .</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia#2722</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
      <description>I dunno, I think there's room for both in the market. GoLive for designers, Dreamweaver for developers, more or less. 

I think GoLive and *Fireworks* are the head-to-head competitors. Or maybe ImageReady?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia#2724</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
      <description>I find GoLive completely unusable. . .anything that makes it go away would be a welcomed change</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia#2725</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adobe to acquire Macromedia</title>
      <description>The Street apparently saw this acquisition as a minus for Adobe as its share price fell slightly. Adobe's long tried to position itself as the company for content providers. It seems to me that this will allow them to strengthen that angle. I'm still waiting for the day when they corner the Quark market and get all those unhappy Quark users over to InDesign.

I think Adobe will focus on further streamlining the production process by blurring some of the lines between content programs and web authoring programs, so you can go from one to the other more seamlessly. 

I'm curious what they will do with Illustrator&amp;#47;Freehand since those are also competing programs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.lightstalkers.org/posts/adobe-to-acquire-macromedia#2843</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
