Lightstalkers
* My Profile My Galleries My Networks

Newspaper Photographers

I was reading an ad on a job board for a photographers position and it stated that “photographer must provide his own digital SLR and lenses” How you feel about this? At the last newspaper I worked at, our equipment was provided, but I don’t understand why more newspapers are making photogs buy their own stuff. Is it just me? because I don’t see writers buying their own computers/laptops.

by Chip Oglesby at Fri Jun 09 00:09:26 UTC 2006 (ed. Mar 12 2008) Charlotte, United States | Bookmark this | Digg this |

I wonder if newspapers don’t want to be dealing with all the system upgrades that happen. This was not really an issue back in the film days. However, if it’s a major publication you’ll probably find that there is a budget for equipment given to the photographer in addition to their salery to cover annual equipment expenses. I know of this being the case at some papers. And it’s often quite generous. It saves the paper a great deal of hassle particularly with regard to Canon v Nikon debates and such like.

by Paul Treacy | 09 Jun 2006 01:06 | Manhattan, United States |
I guess, it just seems like another cost saving measure that works out bad in our favor.

by Chip Oglesby | 09 Jun 2006 04:06 | Charlotte, United States |
ya,
the situation is similAr in India. here small publication houses dont have their pro-photogarphy equipments. its the photographer who owns that and work not only for the organisation, also his own assignments for early recovery of camera and equipment cost.
its seems the newspapers are not eagar to develop their exclusive team in the field of photography

SUBHAMOY

by Subhamoy | 09 Jun 2006 07:06 | Assam, India |
It’s been a long time since I made my living as a newspaper shooter, but most smaller papers do require your own gear. The reporters have access to point and shoot for simple articles and the photographer gets assignments from the editor based on what that person thinks are the most important items.

by [unverified member] | 09 Jun 2006 12:06 | East Tennessee, United States |
I used to work in Manila and the paper I shot for provided digital equipment, but that was after I paid my dues, sort of, by shooting with my old analog Nikon. Other photographers, even those working for major broadsheets, were not as fortunate and were forced to shoot with their own cheap point-and-shoot digital cameras or their Nikon F3s or FM2s that hail back to their 70s or 80s heydey. I discovered that the situation is similar here in the US, though most photographers can afford their own professional gear instead of cheap amateur cameras or if they still use film, they’re updated. The Jersey City paper my wife shoots for does not provide gear but gives an annual allowance to cover SOME of the costs of maintenance and upgrading. A freelancer like me is expected to have my own equipment. Otherwise, I can’t get jobs anywhere. I really don’t know if that’s always been the case.

by Max Pasion | 09 Jun 2006 13:06 |

Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
Feed-icon-10x10 via RSS
Recommended
Icon_email via email
You can unsubscribe later.

More about sponsorship→

Participants

Chip Oglesby, photojournalist Chip Oglesby
photojournalist
(dreamer/doer)
Columbia, South Carolina , United States
Paul  Treacy, Photographer Paul Treacy
Photographer
(Photohumorist)
New York City , United States ( JFK )
Subhamoy, PHOTOJOURNALIST Subhamoy
PHOTOJOURNALIST
Assam , India
James Karney, James Karney
East Tennessee , United States
UNVERIFIED
Max Pasion, Street Photographer Max Pasion
Street Photographer
Bayonne, NJ , United States ( EWR )


Keywords

Top↑ | RSS/XML | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | support@lightstalkers.org / ©2004-2008 November Eleven