* My Profile My Galleries My Networks

EPIC 2014

There’s a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) going around about Google’s technological hugeness and clout. They’ve figured out how to monetize private email, they’re expanding their reach into personal computers and private Web sites, and they clearly do not lack for resources and ambition.

EPIC 2014 is a sort of Wiliam Gibson-esque visualization of that FUD. It treads that fine line between clever and stupid, but I’m posting it because I think it illustrates the fears some have about changing power balances in media.

by Shinji Kuwayama at 2005-10-25 14:18:06 UTC (ed. Mar 12 2008 ) Chicago , United States | Bookmark | | Report spam→

It’s perfectly feasable in some aspects (although I wont be refluffing my quantum foam for a while, unless by 2014 I end up working at Starbucks)

You could argue the Big Two photo-portals are beginning the process already, by not selling pictures – which with Royalty Free imagery are now increasingly worthless – but selling the access portal and editing ability for searchers to find the pictures they want out of an ocean of images, in a timely manner.

However, as the film says, while all these people "are creating and consuming news"…how are they paying the rent?

The idea that they can all be paid by the advertising read by everyone else, kinda reduces the whole thing to a mad pyramid scheme. I read your ad, so I pay you, you read my ad, so you pay me…but with what money? From what income?

I have a real bee in my bonnet about this, because the Creative Commons ‘copyleft’ thing in photography is being pushed to us from one side by software geeks who figure copyright is obsolete, and from another side by corporations who are grabbing our rights in a campaign to make copyright holding the exception rather than the norm, while giving us all this guff about ‘participatory journalism’.

Copyright isn’t obsolete, and in many cases, if used and enforced properly, there is no particular reason why it can’t be just as usable in the digital ‘mediascape’ as it’s always been.

An interesting sidebar is a blog entry I’ve just read. According to a consultancy report, the total earned worldwide from stock photography images is about 2 billion dollars (for all companies, all forms of picture)…but it would be 6 billion dollars – if they didn’t sell Royalty Free images.

In other words, because Royalty Free images are perceived to be low value, that’s what people expect to pay for all images. So the prices of the Rights Managed images they hold have dropped, and they’ve low-balled themselves out of 4 billion dollars of potential sales.

Well, they can afford it – 2 billion, 6 billion, whatever, its all just numbers.

But its not numbers to the individual photographers who create Rights Managed imagery full-time and seek to leverage it for an income in a fair way via these portals, and to be acknowleged as authors.

They are the ones who go down the pan, while the hobbyists dump free images on the Web taken on their time off from their day jobs, and the big stock portals push virtually free images (which they own of course) out and about.

Thats the ‘Global mediascape’ we’re all supposed to be thrilled about, where everyone gets to participate.

Except Africa of course…and China…and anywhere else where the internet doesn’t reach or is censored.

Under this Global mediascape the film talks about, eventually machines compose news stories…but out of what? Out of words still originated by human authors.

Authors who like everyone, have to eat.

by [former member] | 26 Oct 2005 10:10 | London, United Kingdom | | Report spam→

Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
Feed-icon-10x10 via RSS
Icon_email via email
You can unsubscribe later.

More about sponsorship→


Shinji Kuwayama, Software Engineer Shinji Kuwayama
Software Engineer
Chicago , United States ( ORD )


Top↑ | RSS/XML | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | support@lightstalkers.org / ©2004-2015 November Eleven