|
Exhibition Quality Ink-Jet Papers?
|
I have an Epson 2200 Photo inkjet printer which uses ultra-chrome inks. I’ve been using Epson Luster paper as I don’t like high gloss paper and the Epson Matte is good for some pictures but colors die on the matte with most.
Does anyone know of of a luster/semigloss paper better than the Luster paper? Its pretty good, but for exhibition doesn’t always cut it…the surface seems a bit plastic and the luster surface does scatter light some which hurts saturation, etc.
So if anyone knows some good alternatives please give a shout?!
by
Adam Cohen
at
2005-03-31 20:57:42 UTC
(ed.
Mar 12 2008
)
Brooklyn
,
United States
|
Bookmark
|
|
Report spam→
|
|
I have heard good things about Ilford Pearl…..
by
[former member]
|
31 Mar 2005 23:03
| new orleans,
United States
|
|
Report spam→
|
Thanks…..but I’ve tried Ilford Pearl and while its a decent paper it has the same problems. Luster is actually better than the Pearl paper, but…..
|
Have you used the Epson semigloss? I had heard that the semigloss is the same as the luster but when I recently put together a portfolio and attempted mixing the two I noticed a huge difference between them.
by
[former member]
|
01 Apr 2005 10:04
| Florida,
United States
|
|
Report spam→
|
This may be old info, but a couple years ago I sat in on a printing class where Colorlife paper was highly praised.
by
[former member]
|
01 Apr 2005 10:04
| Florida,
United States
|
|
Report spam→
|
Pictorico had some good reviews and claims to have less bronzing than Epson papers
http://www.pictorico.com/
|
hey, adam. the colorlife, i am pretty sure, will not work with the 2200’s inkset. when i was at b&h recently their computer guru guy (sits at a desk in the middle of the camera section, surounded on 3 sides by a counter that has digital cameras leashed to it) was showing me oriental’s inkjet papers. they looked good. take in a file burned to a cd and ask them for a sample print. he’s a nice guy, but i forget his name. the oriental inkjet papers apparently have the same base as their darkroom papers. they have an rc-type and, it seems, some type of fiber-based. looking at the b&h website now i have 3 observations: 1) oriental is expensive. 2) much of it is not in stock.
ok, 2 observations, i forgot the third . . .
by
[former member]
|
02 Apr 2005 13:04
| New York City,
United States
|
|
Report spam→
|
Hey folks….I’m testing an InkJet paper that shows promise. Its the UltraPro Satin made by Red River Paper. So far I like the surface better than the Epson Luster and it seems to have fewer problems with reflections and a wider viewing angle. I’m going to go on working with it and am curious about other people’s experience with it.
And at $30.60 for a 100 sheets of 8.5×11 its definately cheaper than Epson.
Also compatable with Epson UltraChrome Inks.
http://www.redrivercatalog.com/index.htm
|
An interesting site about papers, calibration and printing. They also sell custom ICC Profiles which I know nothing about….so this not an edorsement for that.
http://www.drycreekphoto.com/
|
I’ve just started using Epson Premium Luster for promo cards – does anyone know of a comparable paper that doesn’t have a logo on the back? It’d be nice to not see the Epson brand on the back of my cards… Adam, how about the UltraPro?
|
Anpther nice thing about the UltraPro, nothing on the back.
|
|
Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
|
via RSS
Recommended
|
via email
You can unsubscribe later.
|
|
|
Participants
|
Frazer
Photographer
[undisclosed location].
|
Keywords
|