<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<post>
  <area-id type="integer">581</area-id>
  <body>Hey all -- couple of updates to the image database today. We've added a new (optional) &quot;taken at&quot; field; you can use this to specify the date on which a particular photo was taken.

We've also updated &quot;image search&quot;:/search/images to reflect this; you can search for images taken within a particular timeframe. You can also now sort your search results.

IPTC question:
The IPTC core specification does include date fields; is this usually an accurate indicator of when the photo was taken? If we get a consensus that it is, we'll add it to the list of fields automatically imported. If not, we'll skip it and let you set this manually as you see fit.

Thanks -- if you see any problems, please report them to support@lightstalkers.org. </body>
  <cal-dtstart type="datetime" nil="true"></cal-dtstart>
  <comments-count type="integer">2</comments-count>
  <created-at type="datetime">2008-01-23T00:36:35Z</created-at>
  <edited type="integer">0</edited>
  <edited-at type="datetime">2008-03-12T12:57:02Z</edited-at>
  <flagged type="boolean">true</flagged>
  <id type="integer">19859</id>
  <in-violation type="boolean">false</in-violation>
  <last-comment-author-id type="integer">3001</last-comment-author-id>
  <lastreply-at type="datetime">2008-01-23T10:34:00Z</lastreply-at>
  <location>Chicago</location>
  <location-private type="boolean">true</location-private>
  <lock-at type="datetime" nil="true"></lock-at>
  <locked type="boolean">false</locked>
  <permalink>image-dates-and-search-improvements</permalink>
  <public type="integer">1</public>
  <title>Image dates and search improvements</title>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2008-03-12T12:57:02Z</updated-at>
  <user-id type="integer">11</user-id>
</post>
