|
Seb Geo
|
| Profession: |
Photographer |
| Location: |
Sivignon,
France
|
| Home base: |
Green Hills, France |
|
Email:
|
•••••••• (private)
|
|
Languages spoken:
|
French, English and Italian.
|
|
Mobile phone:
|
•••••••• (private)
|
|
Blood type:
|
A1+
|
|
Last login:
|
about 10 hours
ago
|
|
Member since:
|
03 Jun 2008 12:06
|
|
Gallery
Recent Post
I used to have the 17-35L then the 16-35L on film cameras for years – the first one much better than the second (lot of flare, so soft full open). When not using the Leicas, the lens is my all-purpose tool.
As I recently got equiped in digital with a 5DII, I was even more disapointed with the 16-35 mark I. So I decided to shift to the mark II. Can you imagine, a slight difference only ! It becomes quite ok at stop 5,6 or 8. And I have big needs in low light. That body must be a lens slayer.
It is covered with the garantee so I’m thinking about sending it back to Canon. By the the way, my partner have GREAT results with the “old” 2.8/17-35 on a D700…
Have you experienced already such troubles with that lens ? Which wide angle lens would you advise for the 5DII ?
14 Jul 2009 12:07
|
4 replies
Keywords
|
Personal Network
|