Lightstalkers
* My Profile My Galleries My Networks

She said "How did you ever do it before digital?"

The digital luddite thread reminded me of something from yesterday that made me chuckle. I had to photograph the head of a local cancer center with their new hulking nuclear linear accelerator for deep tissue cancer treatments. Any of you who do annual reports, corporate work or business news do these kind of shots often: you put the camera on a tripod, light the room and subject in an interesting way with strobes while burning in the pretty lights and displays of the machine with the room lights out. Not a tricky shoot if you’ve done them before.

So I’m setting up my lights, get a few meter readings and then take a test shot and take a look at it just to make sure that I didn’t forget anything. The subject says “How did you ever do this before digital.” I told her that it was the same thing only I shot it on film and would take a few more shots to back me up. I’d still be able to have a test shot if I used my medium format camera with the Polaroid back. No big deal.

But to her it was. People are gotten so used to the idea / marketing chatter that digital is “easier” or “better” that they forget all the shots that were done just as well before digital was around. Funny huh?

Do any of you get that kind of response from people? They are used to us carrying around very high-tech gear but do they act differently when you, say, shoot a film camera? I certainly get conversation going when I pull out my 2 1/4 twin lens.

But still to some people it’s like we couldn’t make photographs worth a darn if we didn’t have a 10MP, 8 fps, digital body with a big zoom lens and stabilization.

Funky huh?

by Jonathan Castner at Fri Sep 21 15:29:43 UTC 2007 (ed. Mar 12 2008) Denver, United States | Bookmark this | Digg this |

The usual question I get is, “Is that digital, or is it an SLR?”

by Dave Walsh | 21 Sep 2007 18:09 | Dublin, Ireland |
I only ever seem to be asked, which Nikon my camera is. They’re always taped up.

by Paul Treacy | 21 Sep 2007 18:09 | New York City, United States |
Here everyone will simply refuse to work with you if you say that you are going to use a film camera for shooting…..they think it very amateurish to use a film camera.

by santanu chakrabarti | 21 Sep 2007 18:09 | Kolkata, India |
good story Jonathan!

It’s right up there with a group I was shooting, and they walked up to me after, and said, “Let’s see what you got!”, as I stood there with my M6. I faced the back of the camera to them as they approached.

It was classic.

by Joel Aron | 21 Sep 2007 23:09 | San Francisco, California, United States |
I like my M4 because I don’t have to remember to turn it off.

by Keith Dannemiller | 21 Sep 2007 23:09 | Mexico City, Mexico |
Joel you just hit on one of my “modern photography” sore spots: the “Let me see the photo!” reaction by subjects. They are so used to chimping the photo that they forget that there was a time that the way that they saw “the good one” was when they read the story in print. Now everyone expects that instant gratification. I gotta tell ya that sometimes I don’t want to show them the screen and wish that I was shooting film just so they wouldn’t bug me about it. In the film days they trusted you to know what you were doing. Now they expect you to show them if you are “pro” by letting them see your work right after you have made the photo.

I think that one of the interesting aspects of our lovely digital cameras is that the mystery is gone.

by Jonathan Castner | 22 Sep 2007 00:09 | Denver, United States |
.... and then print it off as they chat….................. http://www.demo.com/demonstrators/demo2007/91378.php

by Imants | 22 Sep 2007 00:09 | Dusitrealimatta, Australia |
I’ve had the weird experience of watching someone’s lip curl with distaste for how they look on glancing at the back of my camera, yet when I’ve spent 5 minutes with it in photoshop, they’re ecstatic. Mind you, people prefer themselves in b&w…

by Dave Walsh | 22 Sep 2007 13:09 | Dublin, Ireland |
I’m into digital now for few months .. and I hate it ! I use it only because It’s faster and smoother for me to send those pix to my agency, but I still use my M6 & other analogue equipment for assignments where I have the time ..

People often ask me how the hell I can do any photographs with that little funny camera (Leica M6) .. ;)) The funny thing is that when I look @ my best pix, all are done with analogue, old-school cameras on film .. Digital is only faster & lighter to work with ‘cause you don’t have to have an extra bag with a cooler & tons of different films & of course you see right away whats goin on. And all those 10MP’s .. you don’t need them .. All assignments I’ve done for the agency & some mags, are done with old-school equipment..

My first assigment on digital was with an SONY DSC R-1 because I had to shoot in an highly secured prison, where I had to be very quiet and the prisoners should’nt see me shooting them (the camera is like the 6×6 Hasselblads, looking from above) .. The quality on this camera is unbelivible close to my M6, but again .. we don’t need all those pixels ;)) One mag here in Croatia (Digital Photography) wants to make an interview with me because I still use this old cameras, the editor told me that people won’t belive what you can do with that “can” .. Of course that was an compliment for me, but it’s sad that people are more using their cameras to think insted of them ..

by Petar Kürschner | 25 Sep 2007 13:09 | Opatija, Croatia |
I am still 100% film, so whenever I need to take a break on a job to reload my camera, brows are usually being raised curiously.

I was shooting for a medical mag a few months ago, and one doctor asked: “So you’re still shooting film? How do you know you got the shot?”

It cracked me up. Isn’t that what we’re here for? I told him “Well, we’re all trained to get it, even without a preview.” 4 seconds of silence. “Aha.”

On the other hand, when passers-by ask what kind of camera I’m shooting with, and I say “It’s old school, film.”, they often say “Oh, so you’re a real photographer …”. And while I don’t think using film makes me real, the sentiment always makes me smile. :)

by Imke Lass | 25 Sep 2007 14:09 (ed. Sep 25 2007) | Savannah, GA, United States |
The most beautiful hing with film is that after having taken the picture you look into the eyes of whom you have in front, instead of looking at the back or your camera, esp. the younger people is surprised by that. Cool feeling. Connection.

by eva m k | 26 Sep 2007 14:09 | Tuscany, Italy |

Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
Feed-icon-10x10 via RSS
Recommended
Icon_email via email
You can unsubscribe later.

More about sponsorship→

Participants

Jonathan Castner, Photojournalist Jonathan Castner
Photojournalist
Denver, Colorado , United States ( DEN )
Dave Walsh, Writer, photographer, med Dave Walsh
Writer, photographer, med
(Storyteller)
Dublin , Ireland
Paul  Treacy, Photographer Paul Treacy
Photographer
(Photohumorist)
New York City , United States ( JFK )
santanu chakrabarti, Freelance photographer santanu chakrabarti
Freelance photographer
(Camerawala, obsessed by images)
Kolkata , India
Joel Aron, VFX Artist / Photographer Joel Aron
VFX Artist / Photographer
San Francisco, California , United States ( OAK )
Keith Dannemiller, Photographer/Photojournal Keith Dannemiller
Photographer/Photojournal
Mexico City , Mexico
Imants,  Photographer, Artstuff, Imants
Photographer, Artstuff,
(gecko hunter)
The Boneyard , Australia ( Hp )
Petar Kürschner, Photographer Petar Kürschner
Photographer
Opatija , Croatia ( AAA )
Imke Lass, Photographer Imke Lass
Photographer
Savannah, GA , United States
eva m k, cabby eva m k
cabby
Tuscany , Italy ( SAY )


Keywords

Top↑ | RSS/XML | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | support@lightstalkers.org / ©2004-2008 November Eleven