|
Speakers' corner
|
Just put up a rough edit of a story I shot a few years ago about speakers’ corner in london
http://www.lightstalkers.org/galleries/slideshow/11735
comments and brickbats welcomed!
from wikipedia
“Though Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner is considered the paved area closest to Marble Arch, legally it extends as far as the Reform Tree and covers a large area of the adjacent parade ground. Public riots broke out in the park in 1855 in protest over the Sunday Trading Bill which forbade buying and selling on a Sunday, the only day working people had off. The riots were described by Karl Marx as the beginning of the English revolution.
Speakers’ Corner on a Sunday in April, 2004 The Chartist movement used Hyde Park as a point of assembly for workers’ protests but no permanent speaking location was established. The Reform League organized a massive demonstration in 1866 and then again in 1867 which compelled the government to extend the franchise to include most working class men. The riots and agitation for democratic reform encouraged some to force issue of the “right to speak” in Hyde Park. In 1872 the Royal Parks and Gardens Act delegated the issue of permitting public meetings to the park authorities (rather than central government). Contrary to popular belief it does not confer a statutory basis for the right to speak at Speakers’ Corner. Parliamentary debates on the act illustrate that a general principle of being able to meet and speak was not the intention, but that some areas would be permitted to be used for that purpose. Since that time it has become a traditional site for public speeches and debate as well as the main site of protest and assembly in Britain. There are some who contend that the tradition has a connection with the Tyburn hanging gallows where the condemned man was allowed to speak. Although many of its regular speakers are non-mainstream, Speakers’ Corner has been frequented by Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, George Orwell, and William Morris. Its existence is frequently upheld as a demonstration of free speech, as anyone can turn up unannounced and talk on almost any subject, though they are likely to be heckled by regulars. It has been argued that the existence of a specific location where free speech is permitted is used as an excuse to prohibit free speech in most public spaces in London, including the rest of Hyde Park and all other Royal Parks, where free speech is forbidden in written by-laws[citation needed].In the late 19th century, for instance, a combination of park by-laws, use of the Highways Acts and ase of venue licensing powers of the London County Council made it one of the few places where socialist speakers could meet and debate. In 2003 the park authorities tried to ban a demonstration set for February 15 to stop the war in Iraq. This caused uproar and forced a climbdown.”
by
Brian David Stevens
at
Sun Apr 13 10:20:47 UTC 2008
(ed. Apr 15 2008)
London,
United Kingdom
| Bookmark this
| Digg this
|
|
|
That was good to see Brian….. now that I’m living here it’s made me want to get out of my bathrobe, jump on the tube & start exploring!
|
|
|
Brian
That is a fantastic body of work. I watched the slideshow twice. Let’s hope in our so called democracy it continues.
Are there any CCTV cameras covering speakers corner?
|
Mark there are a couple put in now, that were not there when I was shooting , every so often the police would do a walk through to make sure thing were not getting to overheated…
|
The edit as it stands now is completely overwhelming, but in a good way. I think a ten to fifteen picture edit will be extremely powerful. The Nike diptych works really well. I could also see a possible series with using hands to tie them together. The sign shots got a little redundant. I also really love seeing the old folks out with their canes and walkers. There is a shot with a guy in a walker in the background and then a nice wide shot with a guy sitting down with his cane out. Those two shots go very well together. The “stop blaming the white man” shot made me smile. The sign about the guy getting pushed over was sad. It seems like you could also do something with flags. After looking at the whole work, I would consider doing a traditional diptych project. I’m see two flag shots that show different sides of an issue. The two Nike shots, two hand shots, and on it goes. I know that diptychs are a little “in vogue” right now, but I think that this being a place of debate and free speech could really be symbolized by using diptychs. You’d just have to make sure you weren’t banging people over the head with it by being too literal. I like the project though, makes me want to get London.
|
Thanks for that Cameron, Its a big edit, but I’m using the length of Winogrand’s The Animals as a rough template so its more a ‘book’ edit rather than a mag story, so the diptych idea will really work well for facing pages hmmm more work
|
|
Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
|
via RSS
Recommended
|
via email
You can unsubscribe later.
|
|
|
|