|
What does one say?
|
when a magazine doesn’t give credit even though i’m not really worried about it. it isn’t a widely publicated mag, there was never any money to begin with, and the image is a behind the scenes type image that doesn’t really showcase my work. Should i even bother writing them?
by
Marc Kelly
at
Mon Apr 28 19:33:00 UTC 2008
(ed. Apr 28 2008)
Brooklyn,
United States
| Bookmark this
| Digg this
|
|
|
Yes. Absolutely. No hesitation.
If you knew that there was going to be no money (I’m assuming that you did), and that you were not going to get a photo credit, and that your image would be hidden behind text, would you have given them the image to use? I’m guessing not. Bad enough they couldn’t (wouldn’t) pay you, but to not give you credit is unacceptable, and to let their actions slide is to condone it, leaving the next photographer to face the same delima.
|
It’s all about protecting your’s and the next photographers’ long-term interests. If editors get away with it unchallenged on a regular basis (whether it matters to you or not), it will become their MO to the detriment of all.
|
|
Get notified when someone replies to this thread:
|
via RSS
Recommended
|
via email
You can unsubscribe later.
|
|
|
|